For the fourth time in five Olympics, the United States Women’s National Team won the Olympic gold medal, and there was much rejoicing throughout the land. But the US defeat of Japan leaves one question unresolved. Have Nadeshiko done enough to be bumped up to first class for the plane trip home or will their federation continue to treat them like second-class citizens?
The Olympic semifinals, final, and bronze match were the best of all possible match-ups. Each semifinal pitted two teams with similar styles against each other. On one side of the bracket, the United States and Canada, two very physical team knocked the stuffing out of each other for 120 minutes. On the other side, France and Japan fought an intense, technical battle that was akin to a footballing game of chicken–the side that blinked in their high stakes game of perfection lost. Unsurprisingly, the US and Japan, the two top-ranked teams at the tournament came out victorious.
In contrast to the semifinals, the final and bronze medal match pitted teams of opposing styles against one another, and the results were no less enthralling. Both matches were grudge matches of a sort. At the World Cup, we all remember the incredible final between the US and Japan. However, in the group stages of that tournament Canada played France and was beaten badly (4-0). That match did three things–it (1) eliminated Canada from the tournament; (2) announced France to the world as a potential title challenger and future world power; and (3) effectively ended the reign of Canada’s coach Carolina Morace. Morace had done wonders for Canada’s level of play, but her contentious relationship with the Canadian footballing authority had severe ramifications for the World Cup. After the match against France, Morace was out and John Herdman was in. Canada abandoned the more technical game it had been trying to play and returned to a more physical style. The Olympics result seems to validate that change.
Canada desperately needed the bronze medal. The loss to the US in the semifinals was heartbreaking because they were so close to both the final and to finally beating their bogie team. Canada had never before been in the top three of either the World Cup or the Olympics (they were 4th in the 2003 World Cup, losing the final match to, shock surprise, the US). And the World Cup in 2015 will be held in Canada, which means the expectations on the team will triple–at least. The bronze medal was a way to redeem the tournament and to motivate for 2015.
France too had something to prove. Les Bleus want to be seen as world beaters, but they have yet to beat any of the top teams when it counts. They also have the loss of the 3rd place match in the World Cup hanging over their heads. By all rights, the French should have beaten Sweden, not just because they are a more talented side, but because Sweden were a woman down. That France beat Sweden in the Olympic quarterfinals last week is an indication that France are in fact better. Did France choke at the World Cup? I don’t think so, but they certainly were not at their best. Maybe they were moping over their loss to the US (in their minds an inferior team) while Sweden really wanted a medal.
For the vast majority of the 90 minutes in Coventry, France were the better side. They had better ball possession, they were better passers, they had more shots on goal. Yet a goal from Diane Matheson just before the end of second half stoppage time (literally, there were about 10 seconds of the match left) made all the difference. This is an example of why football is a game maddeningly resistant to statistics. On paper, everything pointed to a French victory, but in the end the Canadians were draped in bronze. This is apparently the first time since 1936 that a Canadian team won a medal in widely played team sport at the Summer Olympics.
For good measure, the awe-inspiring Christine Sinclair was the tournament’s top scorer. One hopes that Sinclair will be seriously considered for player of the year at the FIFA Oscars in December. This match was her much earned redemption. But Sinclair as Player of the Year would require the voters and nominators to actually know something about women’s football, and I don’t have that much faith in them.
As for the French, I wonder where they go from here. I also wonder if they keep their coach. Bruno Bini has done an excellent job of pulling the French close to the ranks of the elite, but I have my doubts that he is the right person to take them to the next level. What is Carolina Morace doing these days?
Oh, Carli Lloyd, all is forgiven. For the second Olympics in a row, Lloyd scored all the US goals in the final, therefore winning the gold medal both times for team and country. In 2008, Lloyd scored the only goal in the match between the US and Brazil. This year she scored both US goals in the 2-1 victory over Japan. Carli Lloyd is not everyone’s favorite player, and probably unfairly maligned at times, but she comes through in a major way during the Olympics.
The final was a match of exceptionally high quality, as good an advertisement for the game as any. The two best teams in the world (absent Germany is the third member of the triumvirate) play completely different styles, which makes their matches all the more interesting and intense. This was a narrower 2-1 than the score suggested. Japan could have had more goals had luck been with them. The US could have had more goals had they been a little luckier. There were some questionable calls (the Tobin Heath handball that apparently wasn’t), but that’s football. But there was also moments of brilliance, especially Hope Solo’s incredible saves. This was a match with two teams who deeply respect each other playing their absolute best.
The traditional rival of the United States had been Norway, the only team to beat the Americans in the Olympics. Norway and the USA play a similar muscular style, but the history of animosity between the two national teams led to some intense clashes. Now Norway’s time has passed, and they will continue to fade as the new challengers to the US rise. Japan do not have as long a history with the US, but I believe they are the rivals of the future. Norway’s decline is abetted by the rise of more women’s teams in Europe. In contrast, the more teams that Asia develops, the strong it will make Japan on the world stage. Unlike the US/Norway rivalry, which was made compelling by the mutual animosity that arose from the battle for early supremacy in the women’s game, the nascent rivalry between the US and Japan will be made compelling by the contrast in styles and the quality of the matches.
Over the past year, the US and Japan have battled back and forth for the title of best women’s team in the world. I’m not sure that the Olympics settled the debate, but the gold medal does make a strong argument for the US. As I have argued before, the USWNT are not chokers or big game bottlers. They are arguably the best team in the world, and at this Olympics they proved it.
I am going to make a not-so-bold pronouncement. There is no women’s football program in the world as successful as that of the United States. Since the beginning in the 1991, the US has never come in less than third in the World Cup, and has never gotten less than silver in the Olympics. Two World Cup titles and four Olympic gold medals. That is unmatched success, especially when compared with the other teams who have won any of those two titles: Germany (2003 and 2007 World Cup), Norway (1995 World Cup, 2000 Olympics), and Japan (2011 World Cup). No women’s nation has repeatedly replenished its talent as successfully as the US has, from Michelle Akers to Alex Morgan. Norway and China faded, Brazil does not seem interested in replacing Marta, Japan is a relatively new arrival at the top, and Germany suffers through dramatic peaks and valleys. In all this time, the US has remained at the top of the game.
I know I say this a lot, but it is worth repeating over and over again. The women’s international game is far more interesting than the men’s international game. Spain aside, the men simply do not bring to the international game what they do to the club game. In contrast, every elimination round match in the women’s Olympic tournament and many of the group stage matches were exceptional in their level of intensity and excitement. I don’t care if O Fauxhawk and Brazil win their first gold medal, and I haven’t cared all tournament. In contrast, I deeply cared about the entire women’s tournament, about how all the teams do, and about how they will be received by their countrymen and women.
As much as I trash English football, I must admit that the venues in Great Britain are unmatched in terms of history and tradition. It was great to see women play at Hampden Park, Old Trafford, ans St. James’ Park. And of course Wembly Stadium. That over 80,000 spectators crammed into Wembly to watch a women’s football match is a great credit to the sport. I cannot recall any Olympic women’s football tournament getting this kind of attention before. Perhaps this is the moment when the world finally embraces the sport.
Because I read the forums at BigScocer, I know there are a lot of people who dislike Pia Sundhage and her style of management. When asked about whether he would renew her contract, Sunil Gulati, the head of the United States Soccer Federation, was evasive and somewhat cool to the idea. It also, of course, depends of whether Sundhage wants to stay.
But it is unquestionable that Sundhage’s tenure has been a rousing success. The facts speak for themselves. Before she arrived, the USWNT were at the lowest point in the program’s history (at least since the start of tournament play). Before Sundhage took over, the US were eliminated by Brazil in that match with that goal at the 2007 World Cup having suffered the program’s worst defeat ever (4-0). In the three major tournaments Sundhage coached, the US finished first, second, and first. For the majority of her tenure, the US have ranked first in the FIFA rankings. She is the first coach in the women’s game to win two Olympic gold medals. She took a broken team at war with itself and turned it into an irresistible force.
I hope that US fans recognize what Pia Sundhage has done with the team and appreciate that. For my money, she is just as successful as Anson Dorrance or Tony DiCicco.
The US women have now won four of the five Olympic tournaments. That’s quite a record, and only the US basketball teams can compete. Each Olympic victory has had its own special feel. The 1996 was about the team announcing itself to the nation. 2004 was the swan song of the Fab Five (Mia Hamm, Julie Foudy, Joy Fawcett, Brandi Chastain, and Kristine Lilly). 2008 was the rebuilding year, moving on from the humiliation, turmoil, and disaster of the previous year’s World Cup. 2012 is something difference, and more complex. This is the first major tournament since 1991 in which the US won all of its matches (penalty kicks are officially draws). It may also be the turning point. Japan and Canada pushed the US to the limit and although the US survived, this may be the sign that the time has come to adapt. 2012 should about closing the book on the past and looking at the best way to live in the future.
Astoundingly, there may be a future after all for women’s football in the United States. A new professional league has been announced. Maybe, just maybe, this time it will work?
Anyway, this has been a lot of fun. I love writing about women’s football, and hopefully I will not have to wait until 2015 before I can write again. I hope you have enjoyed these posts too, and will continue to read this blog. Thank you.