That both states are very close is not much of a surprise. Maryland has been a blue state for quite some time, and its proximity to DC–where same-sex marriage is already a reality–had put added pressure on the state to legalize same-sex marriage. All the more so after the Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler released an opinion recognizing out-of-state same-sex marriages (and after Governor Martin O’Malley won his reelection bid last November and pledged to sign the bill.) If the bill passes, there could be a referendum. The good news is that getting a referendum to overturn an LGBT rights law in Maryland has not been successful in the past. The bad news is that equal rights supporters have a very poor track record in state-wide referenda.
Rhode Island is, quite frankly, just a matter of time. If not now, then soon. Before this week, Rhode Island had a very homophobic governor in office. Now Lincoln Chafee is governor. Governor Chafee is undoubtedly a (to quote a now-infamous remark) “fierce advocate” of LGBT rights. He was when he was in the Senate, the lone Republican one could say that about. Lincoln Chafee’s ouster in 2006 was a tragedy. Had he turned independent, Rhode Island would still have a great Senator rather than a future great Governor. However, he was loyal to the GOP in a year when the country was sick of Republicans. Despite an approval rating of over 60%, he lost his seat. When I heard he was running for Governor, I told anyone who would listen that I hoped he would win. After his election he refused to meet with the anti-gay bigots from NOM, and then he called for a marriage equality bill in his inauguration address. That, my friends, is fierce advocacy.
Perhaps if marriage equality is successful in Maryland and Rhode Island, the LGBT rights movement can recapture the momentum that it lost after the failures in New York, New Jersey, Maine, and California.
Future Heartbreak? This Sunday Showtime will air the episode of its new series Shameless, which is an American version of a British series of the same name. One of the characters is a gay teen named Ian Gallagher. I have not seen the British show, and I had never heard about either the original or the American version until today (I don’t have Showtime, but I will watch Shameless the next time I visit my parents.) Having said that, I am excited and terrified at the thought of this show. I am excited because British shows are usually very good at creating gay characters (Beautiful People, the British Queer as Folk). It seems like people really enjoyed the British version, which is now on my Netflix queue. I am terrified because American shows by and large make gay characters horribly one-dimesnional. While I have not watched Showtime lately, their track record with gay shows has been appalling (The L Word, the American Queer as Folk). On the other hand, this is not a gay show, it is a show where one of the central characters is gay. That’s an important difference, and every once in a while, in that paradigm American television does do a gay character well. Maybe Ian Gallagher will be among the lucky few. (Although can we talk about this Ian Gallagher as the anti-Kurt Hummel thing that Vanity Fair and Towleroad are pushing? Gay people come in all shapes, sizes, and colors; to define a gay character as an antithesis of another gay character is to denigrate the entire community, because there is an implied superiority. Kurt and all effeminate/fey gay men around the world are just fine the way they are; the same is true of not-effeminate/fey gay men.)
I’m a little hesitant to watch this show because I am afraid of what would happen if I like it and then Showtime cancels the show? My heart was broken by Beautiful People, and I’m still a little gun shy about new relationships with television characters.
edit: I have been watching the British version on YouTube. It’s funny, but this whole Ian Gallagher as the anti-Kurt Hummel is complete bollocks (as the British say.)
Turkish Orders Another LGBT To Close: Dear Turkey, do you really expect to join the EU? And given that you pull this kind of thing all the time, do you really want to join?
Johnny Weir Comes Out: No, really. I know you’re shocked. And (what incredible timing!) he’s just about to start selling his autobiography/memoirs. But it really was because gay kids are killing themselves. I don’t want to hate on Johnny Weir; I liked his personality, and I liked his skating. But his desire to play the victim now (Big Bad Gay Media made me stay in the closet!) rings hollow given his constant need for the spotlight–including television shows and a movie about his “outrageous” personality. Additionally, after all of his complaining about the constant probing into his sexuality he outed his rival/enemy Evan Lysacek on Chelsea’s Hendler’s show. Dear Johnny, people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones, even you really do hate Evan Lysacek.
Politics: President Obama selected William Daley as his new Chief of Staff, and progressives are up in arms. I share their disappointment that the President appointed someone who believes the Democrats went too far to the left, but we need to be rational about this for a second. No progressive legislation is going to be passed in the next two years, Daley or no. As of this past Wednesday, the Administration is unofficially at war with Congress. In the face of inevitable investigations, government shut-downs, and the 2012 election cycle, nothing progressive was going to get done anyway. The White House needs a general right now and one who is not afraid to fight. (But it would be nice if the Obama White House branched out and employed someone from outside of Chicago. The rest of us are not incompetent.)
League Football: Tomorrow Barcelona plays Deportivo La Coruña in A Coruña. Depor has not had a great season thus far, but they are still dangerous, especially at the Riazor. Barcelona barely got past Athletic Bilbao at the Copa del Rey this week, and squeaked by Levante last week, so there is clearly some rust. That needs to be fixed ASAP given that Real Madrid is always lurking.
For weeks I have been hearing non-stop bashing of La Liga. The whiner complain that it is boring because only one of two teams is going to win, and that’s only because the rest of the league is so weak. It denigrates an entire league, whose overall quality is just as good as any other (and team-by-team there is better technical quality in La Liga than anywhere else in the world.) The bashing is usually from the English (of course), and all they talk about is how only two teams exist in La Liga. Let’s examine why the detractors are hypocrites. Every major league in the world has its big two, three, or four. Spain has Barcelona and Read Madrid; Italy has Juventus, AC Milan, and Inter; England has Manchester United, Arsenal, and Chelsea (and previously Liverpool–sometimes); and Germany has Bayern Munich and occasionally a team that is not Bayern (this year it is Borussia Dortmund.) Ligue 1 has been more competitive of late, but almost no one pays attention to Ligue 1 because the quality is just not there. And we won’t even go into the problems with the leagues in Portugal, Scotland, Holland, and the rest of Europe.
Here are some facts. Since the 1992-93 season, the beginning of the English Premier League, there have been 5 different winners in Spain. There have been 5 different winners in Serie A. There have been 6 different winners in the Bundesliga. There have been only 4 winners in the Premier League.
From the 2000-2001 season to the 2009-2010 season there have been 3 different winners in La Liga, 4 in Serie A, 5 in the Bundesliga, and 3 in the Premier League.
From the 2005-2006 season to the 2009-2010 season there have been 2 different winners in La Liga, 1 winner in Serie A, 3 different winners in the Bundesliga, and 2 different winners in the Premier League.
In the 18 completed seasons since the formation of the Premier League, the top winner of La Liga (Barcelona) has won 8 titles; Serie A has a three tie for the spot as Juventus, Milan, and Inter each have 5 titles (but a lot of suspicion because of the Calciopoli scandal); the top winner of the Bundesliga (Bayern) has won 10 titles; the top winner of the Premier League (Manchester United) has won 11 titles.
This season as it stands, Barcelona leads La Liga by 2 points; AC Milan leads Serie A by 5 points; Borussia Dortmund leads the Bundesliga by 10 points; and the most thoroughly mediocre Manchester United in recent history leads the Premier League by 4 points with two games in hand.
Meanwhile there actually a race in La Liga with two stellar teams (one possibly among the greatest of all time.) In the other three major leagues, there is a lot of mediocrity at the top, which is why the league leaders lose and draw so many matches.
Can we please give lie to this canard that La Liga is boring?
World Football: Chile is probably out of a national coach. The election for head of the Chilean Football Association head was held again, and this time Sergio Jadue won. Bielsa has said he would resign if Harold Mayne-Nicholls (who did not run in the recontested election) was voted out. There is a new head. According to local media, Jadue will try to convince Bielsa to stay, but that probably will not happen.
And FIFA head Sepp Blatter, to the surprise of no one, is now calling for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar to be held in the winter. When will Sepp Blatter go already?
The Asian Cup has started in Qatar. Qatar lost 2-0 to the powerhouse that is Uzbekistan.
Women’s Football: Kristine Lilly finally retired, and it is a sad day for American soccer, men’s or women’s. Lilly participated in five World Cups, and was on the winning side in two of them. She is the most capped player of all time, men or women, and the second highest scorer in women’s history. She saved the US in the final match against China in the 1999 World Cup. It is truly the end of an era, and the US team is all the better for her having played on it.
Music I listened to: Well none, but I did listen to a World Football Daily podcast.