Day Two of Euro 2012 proved it was good to be white, as both the white-shirted squads from Denmark and Germany beat (respectively) the Netherlands (orange) and Portugal (red). Also, Ukraine and Poland have huge neo-Nazi problems.
So first an apology. Because of my work schedule I cannot post daily updates about the Euro, which depresses me tremendously. Although I like to eat as much as the next person, a part of me was hoping to get fired for the summer so that I could sit in front of the television and write about the foibles of the European Championship participants (especially England). That did not happen, and although I am sure I will be thankful about that when the tournament finishes, right now I am just devastated at not being able to watch my time watching televised football. As it is, I am forsaking overtime just to write these blog entries. (If you could do me the favor of spreading the word about this blog, I would be much obliged.) I will try to write updates on Saturday and Sunday.
Day 1 started with all the bloated pageantry and self-regard that one expects from a FIFA-sanctioned tournament. Apparently the actual matches were entertaining, but I could only follow by live blog, so the less said on my part, the better. Greece and Poland drew 1-1 and Russia demolished the Czech Republic 4-1. This proves two things: (1) Russia are the Group A favorite and everyone else is playing for second; and (2) Russia are a Euro-only tournament team that falters come World Cup time. More than likely, none of these teams which is probably a good thing. Winning will only make people, and giving happiness for Eastern Europeans is like giving a seal a million dollars; sure the seal is now rich, but it has no idea what to do with the money. (The Greeks, on the other hand, certainly will know how to celebrate, but right now they probably shouldn’t.)
The major problem of the Euro is the specter of racism which has already reared its ugly. I’m not quite sure anyone should be surprised by this given that we have all been complaining about this inevitability since UEFA awarded this tournament to Poland and Ukraine. FIFA and UEFA are dealing with it in completely expected ways–pretending it isn’t happening until they are forced to, calling the nations who are complaining hypocrites, and forcing everyone to shake hands. Bill Archer has been writing some good columns about this. No sports tournament will ever solve the problem of racism, but the fact that FIFA and UEFA hide their heads in the sand until they are forced to accept awful reality of the situation shows exactly how meaningless their words and gestures really. Expect the same problem (and officials reactions) to come up before the World Cup in Russia in six years.
Without fail, in the months leading up to the Euro the talk turns to how this the best tournament in football, lacking only Brazil and Argentina. (Which is also how it is also viewed in Brazil and Argentina.) Because Asians, Africans, and Americans (North and South) can’t really play that well, and get into the World Cup only because of affirmative action. It’s a dangerous fallacy, but it pops up like clockwork every four years.
Group B of the Euro though actually is the toughest I have ever seen, and it is called the Group of Death for good reason. Every tournament has a Group of Death, but usually what that means is that there are two top teams, one potentially dangerous second tier team, and one unknown quantity. Group B of Euro 2012 though is a real Group of Death in that every team is a top 10 team in the FIFA rankings (make of that what you will). Even little Denmark, widely expected to be the cannon fodder won their qualification group (over fellow Group of Deather Portugal). Germany, Denmark, Portugal, Netherlands. This is the closest you will get to a real Group of Death, short of losers actually being killed–which will probably happen when UEFA inevitably award Serbia the right to host the Euro.
As it became clear that Denmark was going to beat the Netherlands 1-0, we heard over and over again that this is the biggest upset of the tournament so far. No matter how true this is–and this was a huge upset–it is still an incredibly stupid and hollow thing to say on the second day of a tournament after only three matches have been played. But it was a huge upset. Germany and Holland were expected to be the two survivors of Group B and the two teams most likely to challenge Spain for the championship. Today’s results don’t make that prediction untrue, but it is certainly much that much harder for the Oranje to advance.
Credit to Denmark who were up against a far more skilled team yet found a way not only to win but win in an entertaining fashion. Part of the entertainment value is because Denmark were a scrappy underdog up against a veritable football Goliath (granted, one prone to self-destruction) and won without draining the life from the match through incessant fouling and such. Denmark even looked good, which Adrian Healey had to keep repeating, possibly because he himself was having trouble believing that this was possible.
Like most people, I have a soft spot in my heart for the Dutch, and like most people it is because of Total Football, a style that has not actually existed since the late 1970′s, a style that I never saw, and a style that never actually won an international tournament. I have a soft spot because who doesn’t want to see the Netherlands finally get the World Cup victory it has gotten so desperately close to winning three times before failing? (Answer: Germans.)
Nevertheless, I was quite happy to see Denmark win. Until the day I die, I will never stop believing and repeating that there is no such thing as deserve in football. Yet the Dutch waltzed in thinking they deserved the win because they are the Clockwork Orange who have a proud history of beautiful football (pretend 2010 never existed), whereas Denmark are just boring Viking spawn. Keeping in mind that Denmark have just as many international titles as the Netherlands have (one) and Denmark also have a much beloved team that failed in glorious fashion (the 1986 World Cup team). Also remember that that the Danes beat the Dutch when they improbably won the tournament in 1992–expect to hear a lot about that the farther Denmark advances in this tournament.
Denmark was certainly defense-minded (like most teams from small nations… and Italy), but they actually played rather than resorting to incessant, cheap fouls–a lesson the Dutch could have learned in 2010. Smart money says that the Dutch will still advance in to the next stage and the Danes will not, but for Holland, it has just become much harder. If they are not in Hell, then they are at least in a limbo. And their next match is against ancient archenemy Germany. If the Oranje lose that one, not only will they be eliminated, they will retraumatize their countrymen.
Ah, Germany. What is that famous quote by Gary Lineker? “Football is a simple game; 22 men chase a ball for 90 minutes and at the end, the Germans always win.“ It’s so true. Except that it isn’t. Germany have not won a tournament since 1996. In that time, France, Brazil, Greece, Italy, and Spain have won the tournaments that Germany entered and Germany have at best finished second. At the World Cup two years ago, Germany were the revelation, this new, exciting, young, multicultural squad with such potential. They were the instant favorites for this tournament.
Since 2010, Germany’s performance has been lackluster. Now I grant you that there is not much to rate, but they stopped looking like the impressive side from two years ago, and started looking deadly ordinary. Probably because now other teams are expecting them (see also: opponents’ reaction to Spain). Against Portugal, Germany did find a way to win, but it was not pretty, and Germany look awfully mortal.
As for Portugal, why do analysts given them any credit? They talk big, but can’t pull it out. Every tournament it’s the same thing. The only time they got close was the 2004 Euro at home in which they still came in second. Even Holland and Denmark have a Euro title. But Portugal? Nothing. The reason they are given so much credit is because they have Cristiano Ronaldo, the second-best player in the world (MESSI! MESSI! MESSI!) and for some reason analysts who should know better think that one player will make the entire difference. Even Maradona did not all by his lonesome drag Argentina to victory in 1986. That is historical revisionism. And the Greasy One is by no means Jesus Cristiano, a messiah who will lead Portugal to footballing glory where even Eusebio failed.
Portugal are strong (unlike their national economy), defensively organized, and they poach second-string Brazilians. Much like every other national team, including those with better overall players but no superstars. Against better teams once Portugal are broken, they cannot respond; they can only prevent the score from becoming a humiliation. That is what happened at the World Cup with Spain, and that is what happened today with Germany.
Germany and Portugal also carried the shadow of another Euro, and the crumbling European economy. Today’s match had the potential for much metaphor. Depending on which economist you trust, Germany are trying to either (1) keep all those other lazy spendthrift nations afloat; or (2) prevent nations harmed by the 2008 Recession from growing their economies by forcing upon them harmful austerity measures. And in football, like in the Eurozone, Germany again proved that it could have its way with Portugal.
I didn’t watch much of the ESPN commentary between matches (weekends are when I do my chores, so the chance to listen to Alexei Lalas prattle on is going to have remain untaken), but I did notice Michael Ballack in the booth, and I wondered what he was thinking. Four years, he was Germany’s star. Two years ago, after an injury that kept him out of the World Cup–and estranged the Boetang brothers–Germany performed wildly beyond expectations. Philip Lahm turned out to be a good replacement as stand-in captain and did not want to give the armband back, despite Ballack’s protestations and veiled threats. Finally coach Joachim Low came out and told Ballack in so many words that his services were no longer required.* What was going on in Ballack’s mind. Alas, I will never know.
* As a side note, this demonstrates how powerful the British media is. Low says that Ballack is no longer coming back, and this dictate goes unquestioned. Fabio Capello says (correctly) that David Beckham is too old for the national team, and the media and therefore the British population go crazy resulting in Capello having to walk back his statement and become further emasculated in his job. This is why Germany win titles and England do not.