Euro Day 16: A Comedy Of Errors

The football gods have a dark, ironic sense of humor.  The British football media and fans have complained endlessly about Spain’s tiki taka style.  Therefore, those same complainers were forced to watch an England team that could not keep possession, could not pass, and could not score.  And then they lost in that most English of ways.  Penalty kicks.  Again.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The first twenty minutes of this match were surprisingly entertaining; the next hundred were unbearable.  Italy were woeful; England were worse.  Neither team could score, and all attempts (particularly those from England) were almost a parody.  But beyond the shooting, at least Italy looked like a football team–albeit a mediocre one.  England’s players are supposed to be elite; instead they looked like a group of toddlers who had never actually seen a ball before.  The passing in particular was horrendous.

Based on all available evidence, one must conclude that the football gods hate England.  Or maybe not hate exactly.  More like they take pleasure in the suffering of England.  The more ironic the punishment, the better.  This is the only conclusion I can draw from the six years I have been watching the sport.  At the 2006 World Cup, England were ignominiously dumped out by Portugal and a winking Cristiano Ronaldo, then one of the rising stars of the Premier League, who got Manchester United teammate Wayne Rooney red carded for stamping on another Portuguese player.  England didn’t even make the 2008 Euro, and had to hear the rest of the world extol the 2008 Euro as the best ever.  In 2010, England finished second in their group to the United States, were booed of the field by their fans after a lackluster draw against Algeria, and then lost 4-1 against hated enemy Germany after a legitimate England goal was disallowed (calling to mind the famously controversial English goal from the 1966 final against West Germany).  The entire Fabio Capello era was a just a big joke at England’s expense, ending in his abrupt resignation just before the Euro.  And in the years before I watched there was the 1-0 loss to the US in 1950, the dog that urinated on Jimmy Greaves in 1962, the World Cups England did not qualify for in 1974, 1978, and 1994, the other Euros England failed to qualify for in 1964, 1972, 1976, and 1984, all the losses to German opposition (especially those in penalties) who barely think of England as a rival, the 1998 loss on penalties to England’s other hated enemy Argentina (after a red card for a petulant David Beckham), all penalty kick losses (5 out of 6), and, of course, the Hand of Diego.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The American football fan must at some point come to terms with England.  Given the closeness of the UK and US politically, culturally, and linguistically, it is unsurprising that most Americans fans generally see England as something of a big brother to be emulated.  I tend to see them as the drama queen neighbor with whom I am constantly forced to interact and whom I resent for it.  But there is really no other frame of reference for most monolingual Americans because outside of the UK there is very little in the way of football coverage in English (save for American coverage which varies dramatically in quality).  Additionally, the English Premier League is the richest and glitziest league in the world and the one with the best marketing arm, which means everyone around the world watches it.

Look at any American media outlet that has a section about soccer/football.  If there is a writer from another country, the chances are that said writer is English (even if he or she writes about another country that is not England).  Because of the language barrier, Americans, when they read coverage in the foreign press, are more likely to read the British newspapers.  Likewise, American blogs and newspapers are more likely to follow the lead of British media.  ESPN learned that for international tournaments, it is a good idea to have at least one football announcer with an English accent.  It may seem chauvinistic and insulting, but this comes following the failures of many different American announcers, one of whom had never watched a game of football in his life prior to calling a World Cup.  (As I side note, I was really bothered by the cheerleading and excuse making coming from Ian Darke and Steve McManaman in the booth.  It was not until the absolute end that either would admit that England were awful.  It’s one thing to cheer on the US team for an American audience, but it another to cheer on the English team for an American audience.)

As a result we in America are inundated with the opinions of the British.  Trust me when I say it is claustrophobic, especially for me who sees the English ideal as the enemy of football.

As I mentioned yesterday, I am really tired of hearing the English media drone on and on about how boring Spain are.  Tiki taka is the opposite of the English ideal which holds that technique is suspect, possession is cheating, and short passes are beneath contempt.

So the gods of football delivered their latest ironic punishment to England.  England’s players displayed no technique whatsoever, their passes went wrong more often than right, and Italy routinely stripped them of possession.  (And to rub it in just a little bit more, England took the lead in the penalty shootout only to blow it.)   Sure the result was technically a 0-0 draw, but England were thoroughly outclassed and shown up as utterly awful.  One cannot even blame Roy Hodgson given how little time he had to work with the team.

Perhaps it is time to rethink the bias against tiki taka, no?

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Italy meanwhile have just come off an emotionally and physically draining match that showed up their weaknesses and pushed them to the physical limits.  Germany, their opponents in the next round, will have had 48 hours longer to rest and were on cruise control against Greece.  Germany also have a far more talented squad.  The odds are incredibly stacked against Italy.

Expect an Italian victory.  Germany never beat Italy.

The England Manager

Fabio Capello is out, and the British media anointed Harry Redknapp as his successor a long time ago.  If I were Redknapp though (if fact, if I were any manager) I would be asking myself “Why would I want this job?”  If ever there was a poisoned chalice, it is the job of English manager.  The England National Team is doomed to perpetual failure, but unlike almost every other nation doomed to perpetual failure (including the United States), the English fans and the English media expect success.  Oh sure, they hide behind a veneer of cynicism and resignation, but that doesn’t fool anyone, especially as the tournaments start.

England fans see themselves as preordained winners, all evidence to the contrary, and react very badly when the inevitable happens.  In fact, they react badly before the inevitable happens.  Prior to the World Cup, England had a near perfect qualification record, but after qualification was assured and the team’s performance dipped slightly in the meaningless qualifiers that remained, the knives came out–particularly from the media–and the brief honeymoon Capello had enjoyed ended spectacularly.  Not that Capello did himself many favors, mind you, but the media, he was instantly transformed into an ignorant, talentless boob.

Capello, one of the most successful coaches of the past few decades, flamed out spectacularly.  It’s pretty obvious that he had been looking for an out for the past few months at least, and the (latest) John Terry flap gave him the excuse he needed.  Sven-Goren Eriksson and Steve McClaren were well-respected coaches before they took the England job, and now they are national punch lines (especially Eriksson–my God, did Special 1 TV do a good parody of him).  England fans even have ambivalence toward Alf Ramsey.

There is no other country where being named national manager is more punishment than reward save for Brazil, but Brazil fans have reason to expect that they will win every tournament they enter.  So I wonder, why would Redknapp even want this job, and if he gets it, what sins has he committed to deserve such a fate?

Or Maybe Not…

It is almost official, David Beckham is staying in Los Angeles after all.  The deal with Paris Saint Germain fell through, and Beckham plans to remain in MLS for the rest of his career.

The question of course is why (Victoria).  Beckham’s reason, according to PSG, is that he didn’t want to uproot his family who have settled very nicely in LA (Victoria).  But the other issue is hidden lines in the ESPN article.  Stuart Pearce, who will manage the Great Britain Olympics team said that Beckham’s place in his squad will not be in jeopardy if he stays in LA.  This is a completely different response than Fabio Capello’s, who, when he first came to the post of England manager, said that playing in MLS would automatically eliminate Beckham from national team contention.  Hence the Milan stints.

One thing that cannot be denied about Beckham is how devoted he is to playing for the England National Team which, in comparison to the current crop of players, is admirable.  It’s part of the reason why the English love Beckham as irrationally as they do.  Even though Capello is leaving this year, Beckham will most likely never play for England again.  He’s no longer the player he was, and the Great Britain team is his last hurrah.*

One final note.  I cannot wait for the World Football Phone In this Friday.  Sean Wheelock will be eating so much crow from the Beckham-loving audience.

Footnotes (and it’s a long one, sorry):

*  You may be asking yourself about the differences between the English National Team and the Great Britain National Team that will play only at the London Olympics.  In the football world, each of the component nations of the United Kingdom is its own autonomous country with its own autonomous governing body, league, and national team.  At Olympic competitions however, competitors from England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland jointly represent the UK (the team is actually the Great Britain and Northern Ireland team; it’s complicated).  In any other Olympics, all four of the UK’s national teams would individually try to compete.  This year however is different because the home nation is the UK, not England.  Having all four home nations entered in the tournament would be neither viable nor fair.  Ergo, there is one Great Britain (UK) team although only the English FA is participating, because the other three FA’s all feared that FIFA would use the participation to take away their autonomy.  (The player may come from all four nations, but only because the other three FAs cannot stop them.)

Given all that, why pick Beckham when there are so many players in their prime who could be a part of the team?  The International Olympic Committee and FIFA have a somewhat strained relationship when it comes to football.  Once upon a time, football was like rugby and test cricket in that one-off matches and tours were the bread and butter of the international game, and “cup hunting” was looked down upon.  The Olympics though was different, especially as it was only open to amateurs.  It was therefore the premier international tournament in the world.  In 1924, Uruguay shocked Europe by winning the Olympics, and in doing so created the modern game.  After Uruguay defended in 1928 (over Argentina who entered because they were furious that their neighbors/rivals showed up the Europeans first), the World Cup was created, and the Olympics was relegated to second-tier status.  Now the Olympic football teams are U-23 sides that can have up to three players over that age limit.  Clubs however, are not obligated to release their players to the Olympics as they are for other international tournaments.  Additionally, managers, especially of English clubs, hate international tournaments with a passion and will already be forced to release their best players for this summer’s Euro 2012.  Combined, this all means that for one reason or another, the best UK players may not be going to the Olympics (although Gareth Bale wants to go).  Enter Beckham.  He wants to represent his country, no one will stop him from playing, he’s an icon in England, and he has experience in international competitions.  He is the absolute perfect person to play for a UK Olympic football team, and the tournament will be his last hurrah in the international game.